EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

Login

Commentators

Comments

  • Monday, February 6 6 February, 2012
    British scientists want to know who perpetrated the Piltdown Man hoax in 1912. Did the hoaxers expect that the stained skull, jawbone, and “cricket bat” would immediately be spotted as fakes? “No one did any scientific tests. If they had, they would have noticed the chemical staining and the filed-down teeth very quickly. This was clearly […]
  • Friday, February 3 3 February, 2012
    Archaeologists are uncovering the roots of the industrial revolution in Los Angeles, California, at the site of Chapman’s Mill and the San Gabriel Mission. The artifacts include a brass religious medallion, a nineteenth-century Spanish coin, local and imported pottery, beads, and plenty of food remains. More than 60,000 artifacts have been excavated from a b […]
  • Thursday, February 2 2 February, 2012
    A Florida-based deep-sea salvage company has been ordered by the 11th U.S. circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta to return nearly 600,000 gold and silver coins to Spain. The coins were recovered from the ocean’s floor off the coast of Spain in 2007. A large piece of a shipwreck washed ashore on a Lake Michigan beach. […]
  • Wednesday, February 1 1 February, 2012
    Land mines that were probably buried by Japanese forces during a battle in Cebu Province have been discovered on one of the islands of the Philippines. Traces of an eighteenth-century plantation, including the foundations of the main house, a separate kitchen, outbuildings, slave quarters, outhouses, a cistern, and a well have been found in Danville, Virgini […]
  • Tuesday, January 31 31 January, 2012
    Germany has returned artifacts that were looted from Afghanistan’s National Museum  during the civil war of the early 1990s. Tens of thousands of artifacts are still missing. Last year, France returned 297 royal protocol books to Korea. Now, the National Museum of Korea has made some of them available to view online. Saxon coins and a […]

Josephus as a source: difficult and dangerous

319px Poppaea Olimpia Josephus as a source: difficult and dangerousJosephus is the most important source for the first century, yet treating him is difficult and dangerous:

  • we don’t know who he is;
  • an active participant in the events he describes, he has axes to grind;
  • he is a propagandist for his clients;
  • he is writing when surrounded by other, important participants in the events he describes;
  • he survived to become the historian only by deadly deception and he is highly talented in both regards.

Other Flavian sources are also unreliable, but none have as much to offer, or are as devious.

Our understanding of Josephus has been lamentable, for he is also both Josippon, the supposed author of the 10th century, and Saint Hegesippus, Christian chronicler of the early Church.

Right: Poppaea Sabina second wife of emperor Nero. Archaeological Museum of Olympia (Greece)

We need him too much to abandon, or treat with either reverence, or contempt.

In Josephus as a primary source for the New Testament, we detailed how his histories become the framework for much of the canonical gospels, as one of the Flavian Midrash Sources of the New Testament.

Much of the military action he describes is drawn from legionary records and are reliable as far as they go.

This limited reliability should not be allowed to cloud the fact that neither his other sources, nor his personal accounts, are as objective, or based in fact.

Josephus relates numerous tales of divine origin, such as prophecies and dreams. None can be taken at face value. Prophecies are political in character, written to justify a past event, most especially a coup d’état, adding divine authority to ambition realised, much as a coronation.

God speaking to Monobazus
Monobazus, the king of Adiabene, who had also the name of Bazeus, fell in love with his sister Helena, and took her to be his wife, and begat her with child. But as he was in bed with her one night, he laid his hand upon his wife’s belly, and fell asleep, and seemed to hear a voice, which bid him take his hand off his wife’s belly, and not hurt the infant that was therein, which, by God’s providence, would be safely born, and have a happy end. This voice put him into disorder; so he awaked immediately, and told the story to his wife; and when his son was born, he called him Izates.
– Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews – Book XX Chapter 2

Jerusalem pearl Josephus as a source: difficult and dangerous‘Izates’ means ‘Angel’ and this account is probably a source for the angel in Luke 1:10–20 and Luke 1:26–37 foretelling the birth of Jesus.

It would be easy, faced with divine phenomena within histories, to write them out, but Josephus is not that easy to either accept, or reject. He wrote for a purpose and maybe that was served with his audience then, but his statements became part of our history and cultural heritage. That he wrote them is history and they must be dealt with.

One short period of his life deserves close scrutiny, as it offers the prospect of understanding him more fully and in so doing, unlocking the door on the first century from a novel perspective. This period of Roman history is over-abundant with conspiracies and assassinations, over-laden with a layer of muck – filthy gossip posing as history. Historians are unseemly in adding such spice, for the facts tell the story well-enough.

In 64, Josephus went to Rome to negotiate the release of several priests held hostage by the emperor Nero. This in itself needs understanding: the identity of the priests, the basis for their being held by Nero, the identity of the other negotiators.

He gives an account of how he made the acquaintance and gained the friendship of the Empress, Poppaea Sabina. It is unbelievable in each regard.

He then returns to Jerusalem as the first Jewish-Roman war breaks out and thus begins a tale of machination and deception matched only by that for the Saul who is known as Paul of Tarsus. They both are agents for an authority external to Judea.

Right: An IAA employeed wears a 2,000-year-old gold earring inlaid with pearls and precious stones discovered at the City of David archaeological excavation below the Old City walls in East Jerusalem, in relation to the Palace of Adiabene. The earring is made of a coiled gold hoop and has a large inlaid pearl in its centre with two identical gold pendants each adorned with an emerald and a pearl.
The discovery dates back to the early first century, said the director of excavation at the site. The piece was found in a Byzantine structure built several centuries after the jeweled earring was made, showing it was likely passed down through generations, he said.

We need to understand the actions of Josephus and his controllers in order to understand his descriptions of his enemies. These enemies are the rebels, those who are overthrowing the Herodian dynasty and defying Rome. They include the Essenes and Zealots.

Josephus is his proper context reveals too the history of Nero and the conspirators in Rome, which include Poppaea, the imperial freedmen such as Epaphroditus, and behind them all, the axis of power between Antonia Minor and Alexander the Alabarch.

As regards Egypt, one must note the fish merchant who married the 14-year old Poppaea Sabina: Rufrius Crispinus, described as the “dregs” of the “Nile”:

Juvenal: Satire 4
[Translated by G. G. Ramsay]

A tale of a turbot.

Crispinus once again! a man whom I shall often have to call on to the scene, a prodigy of wickedness without one redeeming virtue; a sickly libertine, strong only in his lusts, which scorn none save the unwedded. What matters it then how spacious are the colonnades which tire out his horses, how large the shady groves in which he drives, how many acres near the Forum, how many palaces, he has bought? No bad man can be happy: least of all the incestuous seducer with whom lately lay a filleted1 priestess, doomed to pass beneath the earth with the blood still warm within her veins.

To-day I shall tell of a less heinous deed, though had any other man done the like, he would fall under the censor’s lash: for what would be shameful in good men like Seius or Teius sat gracefully on Crispinus. What can you do when the man himself is more foul and monstrous than any charge you can bring against him? Crispinus bought a mullet for six thousand sesterces—-one thousand sesterces for every pound of fish, as those would say who make big things bigger in the telling of them. I could commend the man’s cunning if by such a lordly gift he secured the first place in the will of some childless old mail, or, better still, sent it to some great lady who rides in a close, broad-windowed litter. But nothing of the sort; he bought it for himself: we see many a thing done nowadays which poor niggardly Apicius2 never did. What? Did you, Crispinus—-you who once wore a strip of your native papyrus round your loins—-give that price for a fish? A price bigger than you need have paid for the fisherman himself, a price for which you might buy a whole estate in some province, or a still larger one in Apulia. What kind of feasts are we to suppose were guzzled by our Emperor himself when all those thousands of sesterces—-forming a small fraction, a mere side-dish of a modest entertainment—-were belched up by a purple-clad parasite of the august Palace—-one who is now Chief of the Knights, and who once used to hawk, at the top of his voice, a broken lot of his fellow-countrymen the sprats? Begin, Calliope! let us take our seats. This is no mere fable, but a true tale that is being told; tell it forth, ye maidens of Pieria, and let it profit me that I have called you maids!

What time the last of the Flavii was flaying the half-dying world, and Rome was enslaved to a bald-headed Nero,3 there fell into a net in the sea of Hadria, in front of the shrine of Venus that stands in Dorian Ancona, a turbot of wondrous size, filling up all its meshes,—-a fish no less huge than those which the lake Maeotis conceals beneath the ice till it is broken up by the sun, and then sends forth, torpid through sloth and fattened by long cold, to the mouths of the Pontic sea. This monster the master of the boat and line designs for the High Pontiff4; for who would dare to put up for sale or to buy so big a fish in days when even the sea shores were crowded with informers? The inspectors of sea-weed would straightway have taken the law of the poor fisherman, ready to affirm that the fish was a run-away that had long feasted in Caesar’s fishponds; escaped from thence, he must needs be restored to his former master. For if Palfurius5 is to be believed, or Armillatus,5 every rare and beautiful thing in the wide ocean, in whatever sea it swims, belongs to the Imperial Treasury. The fish therefore, that it be not wasted, shall be given as a gift.

And now death-bearing Autumn was giving way before the frosts, fevered patients were hoping for a quartan,6 and bleak winter’s blasts were keeping the booty fresh; yet on sped the fisherman as though the South wind were at his heels. And when beneath him lay the lake where Alba, though in ruins, still holds the Trojan fire and worships the lesser Vesta,7 a wondering crowd barred his way for a while; as it gave way, the gates swung open on easy hinge, and the excluded Fathers gazed on the dish that had gained an entrance. Admitted to the Presence, “Receive,” quoth he of Picenum, “a fish too big for a private kitchen. Be this kept as a festive day; hasten to fill out thy belly with good things, and devour a turbot that has been preserved to grace thy reign. The fish himself wanted to be caught.” Could flattery be more gross? Yet the Monarch’s comb began to rise: there is nothing that divine Majesty will not believe concerning itself when lauded to the skies! But no platter could be found big enough for the fish; so a council of magnates is summoned: men hated by the Emperor, and on whose faces sat the pallor of that great and perilous friendship. First to answer the Ligurian’s call “Haste, haste! he is seated!” was Pegasus, hastily catching up his cloak—-he that had newly been appointed as bailiff over the astonished city. For what else but bailiffs were the Prefects8 of those days? Of whom Pegasus was the best, and the most righteous expounder of the law, though he thought that even in those dread days there should be no sword in the hand of Justice. Next to come in was the aged, genial Crispus,9 whose gentle soul well matched his style of eloquence. No better adviser than he for the ruler of lands and seas and nations had he been free, under that scourge and plague, to denounce cruelties and proffer honest counsels. But what can be more dangerous than the ear of a tyrant on whose caprice hangs the life of a friend who has come to talk of the rain or the heat or the showery spring weather? So Crispus never struck out against the torrent, nor was he one to speak freely the thoughts of his heart, and stake his life upon the truth. Thus was it that he lived through many winters and saw his eightieth solstice, protected, even in that Court, by weapons such as these.

Next to him hurried Acilius, of like age as himself, and with him the youth10 who little merited the cruel death that was so soon hurried on by his master’s sword. But to be both young and noble has long since become a prodigy; hence I would rather be a giant’s11 little brother. Therefore it availed the poor youth nothing that he speared Numidian bears, stripped as a huntsman upon the Alban arena. For who nowadays would not see through patrician tricks? Who would now marvel, Brutus, at that old-world cleverness of yours?12 ‘Tis an easy matter to befool a king that wears a beard.

No more cheerful in face, though of ignoble blood, came Rubrius, condemned long since of a crime that may not be named, and yet more shameless than a reprobate who should write satire. There too was present the unwieldy frame of Montanus; and Crispinus, reeking at early dawn with odours enough to out-scent two funerals; more ruthless than he Pompeius,13 whose gentle whisper would cut men’s throats; and Fuscus,14 who planned battles in his marble halls, keeping his flesh for the Dacian vultures. Then along with the sage Veiento came the death-dealing Catullus,15 who burnt with love for a maiden whom he had never seen—-a mighty and notable marvel even in these days of ours: a blind flatterer, a dire courtier from a beggar’s stand, well fitted to beg at the wheels of chariots and blow soft kisses to them as they rolled down the Arician hill. None marvelled more at the fish than he, turning to the left as he spoke; only the creature happened to be on his right. In like fashion would he commend the thrusts of a Cilician gladiator, or the machine which whisks up the boys into the awning.

But Veiento was not to be outdone; and like a seer inspired, O Bellona, by thine own gadfly, he bursts into prophecy: “A mighty presage hast thou, O Emperor! of a great and glorious victory. Some King will be thy captive; or Arviragus16 will be hurled from his British chariot. The brute is foreign-born: dost thou not see the prickles bristling upon his back?” Nothing remained for Fabricius but to tell the turbot’s age and birthplace.

“What then do you advise?” quoth the Emperor. “Shall we cut it up?” “Nay, nay,” rejoins Montanus; “let that indignity be spared him. Let a deep vessel be provided to gather his huge dimensions within its slender walls; some great and unforeseen Prometheus is destined for the dish! Haste, haste, with clay and wheel! but from this day forth, O Caesar, let potters always attend upon thy camp!” This proposal, so worthy of the man, gained the day. Well known to him were the old debauches of the Imperial Court, which Nero carried on to midnight till a second hunger came and veins were heated with hot Falernian. No one in my time had more skill in the eating art than he. He could tell at the first bite whether an oyster had been bred at Circeii, or on the Lucrine rocks, or on the beds of Rutupiae;17 one glance would tell him the native shore of a sea-urchin.

The Council rises, and the councillors are dismissed: men whom the mighty Emperor had dragged in terror and hot haste to his Alban castle, as though to give them news of the Chatti, or the savage Sycambri,18 or as though an alarming despatch had arrived on wings of speed from some remote quarter of the earth.

And yet would that he had rather given to follies such as these all those days of cruelty when he robbed the city of its noblest and choicest souls, with none to punish or avenge! He could steep himself in the blood of the Lamiae;19 but when once he became a terror to the common herd he met his doom.20

1. The vitta, or fillet, was worn round the hair by Vestal Virgins.
2. A celebrated gourmand.
3. i.e. the emperor Domitian.
4. The Pontifex Maximus, i.e. Domitian himself.
5. These were two lawyers.
6. i.e. a fever recurring every fourth day—-an improvement upon a “tertian,” one recurring every third day.
7. i.e. as compared with the larger temple of Vesta in Rome.
8. The Praefectus Urbi, under the Emperors, was the head magistrate in Rome, and exercised many important functions.
9. Vibius Crispus; see Tac. Hist. ii. 10.
10. Acilius Glabrio the younger was exiled, and afterwards put to death by Domitian.
11. i.e. ” son of a clod.” Giants were supposed to be sprung from earth (????????).
12. Brutus feigned madness to elude the suspicion of Tarquin. A simple ” bearded ” monarch was easily imposed upon.
13. Evidently an informer.
14. Cornelius Fuscus, prefect of the Praetorian Guard. He was killed in Domitian’s Dacian wars, A. D. 86-88.
15. Fabricius Veiento and Catullus Messalinus, informers under Domitian.
16. A British prince, as in Cymbeline.
17. Richborough.
18. The Chatti and the Sycambri were two of the most powerful German tribes, between the Rhine and the Weser.
19. Taken as a type of the ancient noble families of Rome.
20. Domitian was murdered, as the outcome of a conspiracy, by the hand of a freedman, Stephanus, on September 18, A.D. 96.

Related posts:

  1. Josephus as a primary source for the New Testament
  2. The Royal Library of Alexandria in the first century
  3. Pliny correspondence with Trajan: Christians or Chrestians?
  4. Jesus son of Sapphias
  5. Chrestians and the lost history of Classical Antiquity
  6. When evil mixed itself with good and befuddled the world
  7. Augustus: the Roman Messiah
  8. The Lysimachus Dynasty
  9. An army of divine men and the secret army of Mithras
  10. Acts of the Chresmologoi: the Role of Oracles and Chronicles in the Creation of Divine Men
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000272446272 David Pelfrey

    Excellent historiographic summary. Nicely done.

  • philostratus.the.elder

    Thank you, David, for those kind words, which are most appreciated.

    Most appropriately, you wrote in the third part on the Gospels According to Hadrian:

    The digital sources of information tend to rely on a specific type of ancient historical source and treat this genre as more or less primary when discussing ancient events.[ii] From a more historical critical approach, this is a tendentious practice and offers a major opportunity for the unwary reader to become misled: professional historians have in most cases very little knowledge on what sources ancient historians (we have to be careful even using this descriptive term and at HHI we are more comfortable referring to them as Chroniclers after a sort) used to prepare their works. To put it another way, most of the ancient so-called histories are actually secondary sources describing events the author did not personally witness entirely, or in many cases, did not personally witness at all.

    The question of what genre these works belong to and the actual degree of historicity they contain, continue to be debated within the historical and archaeological disciplines. For our purposes, and it is the approach we at HHI will take, all ancient writing that we moderns place within the genre of history is suspect, along with the classification of these works as histories in the modern sense of the term.[iii] In short, for most cases it is necessary to treat these ancient chronicles as secondary descriptions of events and therefore seek to cross-check these secondary sources against actual ancient primary source documents in the form of the vast number of non-literary papyri. Such papyri attest to the mostly mundane and ordinary requirements of logistically maintaining the empire, prosecuting its wars, subduing its rebellions, and maintaining its temples and religious obligations.

    Much of what has been accepted as history for this period is, in harsh reality, no more than gossip: a written account claiming to use a lost history in which reference is made to some, even earlier time.

    In my view, gossip is too kind a word, for this ‘histories’ are written often by those with vested interests, axes to grind – they are actively promoting a point a view, often religious and sometimes political. That is, the sources are unreliable in the extreme and worse: they often add such spin and fantasy that trying to unravel fact from fiction is often difficult in the extreme. Yet, they become part of our cultural history and in the classroom are often taught as fact.

    Today, using an example which we have addressed here, most of the world thinks it knows a lot about Alexander the Great, whereas so little is certain that we know for sure almost nothing. No source in history is more difficult than Josephus, because:

      - He represents Jews going to meet the emperor in Rome, whilst almost certainly he is also an agent for Rome.

      - He is a general defending Judea from Roman invasion, whilst supporting the attacking general.

      - He persuades by trickery his colleagues to kill themselves.

      - His histories are composed within the emperor’s family home.

      - In the Judea he describes in his histories, he own large properties employing many Jewish slaves, all gifted to him my the enemy of Judea.

      - Despite all this duplicity, he appears to have a genuine concern to defend Jews and Judaism from calumny.

      - His works become the historical framework for much of the New Testament – itself a tissue of lies, parodies and distortions.

    Even so, tackle him we must if we are to advance into the 1st century.

  • Pingback: When evil mixed itself with good and befuddled the world « History Hunters International