Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
News:
Please Support Us!
Donate with PayPal!
November Goal: $40.00
Due Date: Nov 30
Gross Amount: $25.00
PayPal Fees: $1.58
Net Balance: $23.42
Below Goal: $16.58

©
59% 
November Donations
7th Anonymous $20.00
5th Anonymous $5.00
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
This topic has not yet been rated!
You have not rated this topic. Select a rating:
Author Topic: Were Seafarers Living on Queen Charlotte Islands of Canada 16,000 Years Ago?  (Read 100 times)
Description: Site off Queen Charlottes could revolutionize our understanding of New World col
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Bart
Moderator
Platinum Member
*****

Karma: 143
OfflineOffline

Posts: 1768



View Profile
« on: August 22, 2007, 06:33:03 PM »

Randy Boswell, CanWest News Service
Published: Tuesday, August 21, 2007

   In a Canadian archeological project that could revolutionize understanding of when and how humans first reached the New World, federal researchers in British Columbia have begun probing an underwater site off the Queen Charlotte Islands for traces of a possible prehistoric camp on the shores of an ancient lake long since submerged by the Pacific Ocean.

   The landmark investigation, led by Parks Canada scientist Daryl Fedje, is seeking evidence to support a contentious new theory about the peopling of the Americas that is gradually gaining support in scholarly circles. It holds that ancient Asian seafarers, drawn on by food-rich kelp beds ringing the Pacific coasts of present-day Russia, Alaska and British Columbia, began populating this hemisphere thousands of years before the migration of Siberian big-game hunters -- who are known to have travelled across the dried up Bering Strait and down an ice-free corridor east of the Rockies as the last glaciers began retreating about 13,000 years ago.

   The earlier maritime migrants are thought to have plied the coastal waters of the North Pacific in sealskin boats, moving in small groups over many generations from their traditional homelands in the Japanese islands or elsewhere along Asia's eastern seaboard.

   Interest in the theory -- which is profiled in the latest edition of New Scientist magazine by Canadian science writer Heather Pringle -- has been stoked by recent DNA (Mitochondrial DNA Studies of Native Americans) studies in the U.S. showing tell-tale links between a 10,000-year-old skeleton found in an Alaskan cave and genetic traits identified in modern Japanese and Tibetan populations, as well as in aboriginal groups along the west coasts of North and South America.

   The rise of the "coastal migration" theory has also been spurred by a sprinkling of other ancient archeological finds throughout the Americas -- several of them, including the 14,850-year-old Chilean site of Monte Verde, too old to fit the traditional theory of an overland migration by the "first Americans" that didn't begin for another millennium or two.

   Proponents of coastal migration argue that Ice Age migrants in boats might have island-hopped southward along North America's west coast as early as 16,000 years ago, taking advantage of small refuges of land that had escaped envelopment by glaciers.

   The difficulty is that nearly all of the land that might contain traces of human settlement or activity -- the critical proof for archeologists -- is now under water.

   Several significant finds have been made in raised caves along the B.C. coast that were not inundated by the rising Pacific in post-glacial Canada.

   In 2003, Simon Fraser University scientists reported the discovery of 16,000-year-old mountain goat bones in a cave near Port Eliza on Vancouver Island, and similar finds of prehistoric bear bones pre-dating the glacial retreat have been held up as proof of a shoreline ecosystem that could have sustained large mammals, as well as human hunters.

   The new Parks Canada target is at a site in the Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve just north of Burnaby Island, near the southern end of the Queen Charlottes.

   According to the New Scientist, Fedje has discovered evidence of a prehistoric lake and streambed about 50 metres below the surface at a site called Section Cove, as well as signs that the river and lake were once rich sources of salmon -- an "irresistible" food source for ancient coastal migrants.

   A book published in 2003 by Canadian author Tom Koppel summarized the research projects being carried out along the Pacific Coast while weaving a powerful argument in favour of coastal migration.

   "We have been accustomed to thinking of ourselves as a species in terrestrial terms -- evolving in the savanna of Africa; hunkering in caves in Europe; gradually spreading overland through Asia; and finally trekking dry-shod across a land bridge at the Bering Strait into the Americas while preying upon big ice age animals,'' he wrote in Lost World -- Rewriting Prehistory: How New Science is Tracing America's Ice Age Mariners.

   "But if the scientists on the Pacific coast were right, we also became bold seafarers at a very early date, maritime people who built boats and braved the stormy and icebound shores of the North Pacific."

http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=34805893-6a53-46f5-a864-a96d53991051&k=39922
Logged

Learning is a treasure which accompanies its owner everywhere.
Baja Bush Pilot
Silver Member
**

Karma: 35
OfflineOffline

Posts: 165



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2007, 03:51:09 AM »

Why not?  I think I was 11 or 12 when I borrowed a music stand from church, screwed it to the seat of my 8 foot flat bottom skiff, cut bamboo yardarms and fitted them with my Mom's bedsheets.  I was on the way out of Mobile Bay, between Fort Gaines and Fort Morgan, when some mean old fishermen (pirates!) captured my vessel and towed me home.  I remember wishing I'd made it to the Yucatan when Mom saw her sheets.

Ignorance of previous expeditions doesn't bar adventurous souls from maritime travel.  I know there is a general lack of physical evidence of earlier exploration of the Americas by boat, and of pre-Columbian contact with the Indians by the rest of the world.  But maybe answers lie at an earlier sea level. 

I just can't imagine a seafaring culture, living on the water for many, maybe hundreds, of generations, getting to a point where they decided not to go any further because...?  I don't get it.  I'm a hiker.  I can't imagine a human being not wanting to see what is over the next hill.  Is the next wave or island any different?  Don't try to tell me people were that different in earlier times.
Logged

Regards,

Barry
Tags:
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
History Hunters Worldwide Exodus | TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc